(PS) Strange v. US Army

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20202:20-cv-02408California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEVI GARCIA STRANGE, No. 2:20–cv–2408–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL

FILINGS

v. U.S. ARMY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) However, plaintiff’s application is deficient, and the court cannot rule on plaintiff’s request at this time. The majority of plaintiff’s IFP application is left blank, and while plaintiff lists certain monthly expenses, he provides no information on his income. Thus, plaintiff is ordered to supplement his IFP request by providing the court with more information about his income, expenses, and other areas (as requested on the IFP short form). Plaintiff may refile a completed short form, or may provide supplementary answers to the blank spaces on his original form. Plaintiff shall supplement this information within 14 days of this order. Further,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.