Sahota

(PC) Lear v. Sahota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20202:18-cv-03099California9,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, No. 2:18-cv-3099 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PREETRANJAN SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On screening plaintiff’s complaint, this court found plaintiff alleged the following claims: (1) deliberate indifference to his medical needs for the failure of defendants Sahota, Buckman, and Uddin to provide plaintiff accommodations, including a walker and wheelchair, for his mobility problems; (2) excessive force against defendants Vela, Cross, Porter, and Advincula; and (3) violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) against defendant California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”). (See ECF No. 10.) Before the court are plaintiff’s motions to compel and to appoint counsel. (ECF Nos. 76.) For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant in part plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.