Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion to compel further discovery responses and defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order are before the court. As set forth below, the undersigned grants in part and denies in part plaintiff’s motion to compel, and denies defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order. I. Plaintiff’s Operative Pleading This action proceeds on plaintiff’s third amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 89 (March 7, 2019); 90 (December 20, 2019).) Plaintiff alleges that in 2016, while he was housed at California State Prison-Solano, defendants Kaur (the Sr. Librarian) and Sgt. Chambers issued a 128-B and a CDCR-115 Rules Violation Report1 (“RVR”) against plaintiff on false charges, in retaliation for plaintiff’s filing of a prison grievance against Kaur. (ECF No. 89.) …