(SS)Courtney

(SS)Courtney v. Social Security Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20201:18-cv-01244California1,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLLEEN M. COURTNEY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01244-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY TO FILE

v. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OR

RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN SIXTY

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL DAYS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

SECURITY, REQUEST FOR A SUBPOENA

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 21) 16 On September 13, 2018, Colleen M. Courtney (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”). On February 19, 2019, the Commissioner moved to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction due to failure to obtain a final decision concerning the overpayment of Social Security benefits. On March 26, 2019, findings and recommendations issued recommending granting the motion to dismiss. The district judge adopted the findings and recommendations on April 29, 2019, and judgment was entered in favor of the Commissioner. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.