Trujillo
Trujillo v. Conrad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01627 -SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE J. C. PENNEY v. COMPANY, INC. AS A PARTY IN THIS ACTION ETHAN CONRAD, et al., (ECF No. 57) Defendants.
16 On December 17, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing Defendant J. C. Penney 17 Corporation as a party in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Rule 18 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the 19 defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 20 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 21 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through 22 a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); but see Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 23 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth…