McDaniel
McDaniel v. Diaz
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20201:20-cv-00856California27,868 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 1:20-cv-00856-NONE-SAB Document 43 Filed 12/18/20 Page 1 of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID MCDANIEL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00856-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING IN PART
v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
RALPH DIAZ, et al., (ECF No. 34) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
I.
INTRODUCTION
David McDaniel (“Plaintiff” or “McDaniel”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to
21 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by
22 Defendants Jeff Dirkse, Henry Mendez, and Jose Sousa, which was referred to a United States
23 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF No. 30.) The
24 Court held a hearing on the motion on December 9, 2020. Having…