(PS) Tillman-Conerly v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY, No. 2:20-cv-00950-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER
v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Marilyn Tillman-Conerly (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on May 8, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 12.) On December 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 13), which have been considered by the court. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines,…