(PS) El v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20202:20-cv-02249California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO EL, No. 2:20-cv-2249-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Antonio El (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 3.) On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed an affidavit (ECF No. 4), which appears to be a supplement to the Complaint in light of the fact that the Findings and Recommendations served on Plaintiff were returned as undeliverable. No objections or other documents have been filed by Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.