Luedtke
Luedtke v. Drozd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES LUEDTKE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01662-AWI-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE
DALE DROZD, et al., (ECF Nos. 3, 5)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
14 James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by federal actors. Plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to appoint counsel on November 24, 2020. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. On November 25, 2020, an order issued requiring that Plaintiff show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee after finding that Plaintiff was subject to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. §…