Bouskos

Bouskos v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20201:19-cv-01431California3,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BOUSKOS, individually and No. 1:19-cv-01431-DAD-SAB behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL v. ARBITRATION AND STAYING THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

(Doc. No. 11) Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on defendant J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. No. 11.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), on April 20, 2020, the court took this matter under submission to be decided on the papers without a hearing. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to compel arbitration is granted and the proceedings are stayed pending arbitration. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Bouskos was employed by defendant as a home lending advisor to provide direct lending services to homebuyers. (Doc. No. 1-1 at 7–8.) In this proposed class 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.