Rodriguez

(PC) Cruz v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20201:20-cv-00763California903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, No. 1:20-cv-00763-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

G. RODRIGUEZ, et al., (Doc. No. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 7, 2020, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 4), denied plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis, and directed plaintiff to pay the required filing fee in order to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 6.) Instead of paying the required filing fee, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and directing him to pay the required filing fee. (Doc. No. 8.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.