Hicks
(PC) Ardds v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTOINE L. ARDDS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE ) MOTION v. ) (ECF No. 44) ) D. HICKS, et.al., ) Defendants. ) ) )
Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant D. Hicks for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, 3, ECF No. 23.) On December 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion complaining about numerous of his conditions of confinement. (ECF No. 44.) In the motion, Plaintiff states that he is attempting “to bring awareness of my condition and seek the most costless resolution and accountability or disciple for those officials in violation of federal law.” (ECF No. 4.) To the extent that Plaintiff is seeking to add additional…