Scanlon

Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20201:19-cv-00937California908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427) TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 250267) 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 336-6545 4 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROMAN SCANLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROMAN SCANLON, on behalf of himself, the Case No. 1:19-cv-00937-NONE-SKO general public, and those similarly situated,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

Plaintiff, MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 12 v. (Doc. 75)

CURTIS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

14 Defendant. 15 16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 143, the parties stipulate and request an order modifying the Court’s September 2, 2020 scheduling order (“Scheduling Order”) by extending all remaining deadlines by eight weeks. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.