Monji

Monji v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20201:19-cv-01526California1,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCEL MONJI, Case No.: 1:19-CV-01526-NONE-JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION

TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. (Doc. 31) COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Defendants. 16 The plaintiff seeks to file a second amended complaint to add a third and fourth causes of action raising additional claims of unconstitutional treatment by the Sheriff, the Sheriff’s Office, the County of Kern and Deputy Tyson. (Doc. 31 at 3) The defendants do not oppose the motion (Doc. 32, 33) The Court GRANTS the motion. I. Legal Standards for Leave to Amend Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), a party may amend a pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of service, or if the pleading is one to which a response is required, 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.