Okoroanyanwu

Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20201:20-cv-00584California3,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

17 On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint against Defendants MV Transportation, Inc. (“MVT”), and MVT supervisors Marc Anaya (“Defendant Anaya”) and Scott Germann (“Defendant Germann”) (collectively, Defendants). (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff alleged claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112 et seq., related to the termination of his employment with MVT. (See id. at 4.) The original complaint sought compensatory damages in the amount of $250,000. (Id. at 18.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on April 28, 2020. (Docs. 2, 3.) 27 On May 19, 2020, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint alleging the same claims and amending his request for relief, requesting (1) $35,000 for lost wages; (2) $100,000 for compensatory damages; and (3) $200,000 for …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.