Correia

(PC) Cray v. Correia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20201:19-cv-01641California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH CRAY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01641-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.

F. CORREIA, Defendant. 16 Joseph Cray (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 30, 2020, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Stacia Lynn Johns and Jon S. Allin telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the Conference, and with the benefit of the scheduling conference statement provided by Defendant, the Court and the parties discussed relevant documents in this case and their possible locations. In addition to opening discovery generally, the Court ordered that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced. Therefore, in an effort to secure the just, speedy, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.