Tafoya

Tafoya v. City of Hanford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20201:20-cv-01707California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER TAFOYA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01707-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS

CITY OF HANFORD, (ECF No. 4)

Defendant.

16 Christopher Tafoya (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action. However, Plaintiff did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor did he pay the filing fee. On December 8, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file an application demonstrating that he is entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 2.) On December 21, 2020, the Court docketed a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 3.) On December 22, 2020, Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.