Calaro

(PS) Latorre v. Calaro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20202:20-cv-00886California1,752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNANIE LATORRE No. 2:20–cv–0886–JAM–CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. (ECF No. 10) RAYMUNDO CALARO, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 3, 2020, the undersigned issued an order requiring plaintiff to show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) or 41(b). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, which was returned due to expiration of plaintiff’s mail forwarding service. (See Docket Entry Dec. 8, 2020.) Nor has plaintiff filed proof of service upon any defendant named in this action, as directed in two prior court orders. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed with prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action on April 30, 2020 naming more than thirty individual defendants in her complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Summonses were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.