Bravdrick

(PC) Correa v. Bravdrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20201:19-cv-00369California2,439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELO CORREA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00369-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRAUDRICK, et al., Date: April 26, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Defendants. 16 Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court sets this matter for an evidentiary hearing. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff was incarcerated at Wasco State Prison. Defs.’ Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”) ¶ 1 (Doc. 37-3 at 1). Defendants Braudrick, Maddux, and Salinas were employed at the prison as a correctional officer, a correctional sergeant, and a psychiatric technician, respectively. Id. ¶ 2; Pl.’s Compl. 2-3 (Doc. 24 at 2-3). In his operative, first amended complaint, Plaintiff alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.