Fisher

(PC) Geren v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20201:19-cv-01662California1,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY JAMES GEREN, No. 1:19-cv-01662-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

R. FISHER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendants. (Doc. No. 28) 16 Plaintiff Randy James Geren is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 19, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened the second amended complaint (“SAC”) and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 28.) In particular, the magistrate judge found that plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs because he did not allege that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.