(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20202:19-cv-01663California2,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with this civil action under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (“Title III” or “Wiretap Act”) against defendant Shelton. On September 18, 2020, defendant Shelton filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that this action is barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 29.) On October 15, 2020, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 39.) On October 29, 2020, defendant Shelton filed a motion requesting that the court screen the first amended complaint. (ECF No. 40.) Good cause appearing, defendant’s request that the court screen the first amended complaint is granted. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is vacated. The undersigned herein screens plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.