Akabike
(PC) Quezada v. Akabike
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALVARO QUEZADA, No. 1:18-cv-00797-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
S. SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. No. 30) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 20, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, finding that plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) states cognizable claims of deliberate indifference against defendants Akabike, Ceja, and Harris. (Doc. No. 30.) The magistrate judge further recommended that defendant Sherman and all of plaintiffs’ remaining claims be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim and without further leave to amend in light of plaintiff’s unsuccessful attempts to state cognizable…