Hicks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, No. 1:19-cv-01738-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D. HICKS, (Doc. Nos. 27, 29) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 7, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s third motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 27) be denied. (Doc. No. 29.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed objections on August 18, 2020. (Doc. No. 32.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. …