Holman

Holman v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20201:20-cv-01603California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIANDRA HOLMAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01603-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING WILLIAM M. HOGG

TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN

v. SUPPORT OF HIS PRO HAC VICE

APPLICATION

BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC, et al.,

SEVEN DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 Currently before the court is an application for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District filed by William M. Hogg. On December 23, 2020, Mr. Hogg filed the application along with an opposition to Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. Based on review of the opposition and the declaration filed by Mr. Hogg it appears that Mr. Hogg is actively involved as Plaintiff’s attorney in prosecuting the case. The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California provide that an attorney is ineligible to appear and participate in a particular case pro hac vice if any of the following apply: “(i) the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.