(SS) (CONSENT) Stiles v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20202:19-cv-02246California3,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER ELLSWORTH STILES , Case No. 2:19-cv-02246-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. ECF No. 15 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant. JUDGMENT 16 ECF No. 18 17 Stiles (“claimant”) challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income. ECF No. 1. The case is submitted on claimant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 15, to which the Commissioner filed an opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 18. Both parties have consented to the to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate judge. ECF Nos. 5, 6, 19. The matter is ripe for review, and this court now denies claimant’s motion for summary judgment and grants the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.