Kubicki
(PC) Miller v. Kubicki
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST MILLER, No. 20-cv-00812-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
THEODORE KUBICKI, et al, (Doc. No. 17) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Ernest Miller is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 25, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 10.) On June 29, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 12.) Plaintiff filed objections on July 9, 2020. (Doc. No. 14.) On August 14, 2020, the undersigned…