Marroquin

I. Background

23 On October 21, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 56. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion 25 for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 26 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir. 1988). 27 (ECF No. 30-1.) Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition was therefore due on or 28 before November 16, 2020. On November 30, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within twenty-one (21) days why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff was provided the opportunity to comply with the Court’s order by filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal of this matter, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff has failed to submit any response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and has not otherwise…