Jones
(PS) Ervin v. Jones
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY WAYNE ERVIN, No. 2:19-cv-01883-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JAMES DRENNAN, et al., (ECF No. 52) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (ECF No. 52.) The motion was taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) (ECF No. 57), and the court has considered defendants’ memorandum in support of their motion, plaintiff’s opposition, and defendants’ reply. (ECF Nos. 52.1, 56, 58.) For the following reasons, the undersigned recommends GRANTING IN PART defendants’ motion and dismissing plaintiff’s claims against certain defendants with prejudice. //// //// //// //// 27 1 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and this action is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). BACKGROUND A. Factual Background2 For at least the last 22 years,…