Ogboehi

(PC) Hernandez v. Ogboehi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20211:20-cv-01019California1,667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 ` 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, No. 1:20-cv-01019-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IFEOMA OGBOEHI, et al., (Doc. No. 13) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Armando Hernandez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff asserts causes of action for: 1) deliberate indifference; 2) retaliation; 3) violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act; and 4) violation of prison regulations. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 17, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim for retaliation and deliberate indifference against defendants Ogbuehi and Gonzales but that it failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Doc. No. 10.) Therefore,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.