Sherman

(PC) Williams v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20211:19-cv-01181California242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 || DAVID WILLIAMS, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01181-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO V. ) REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL 12 || STUART SHERMAN, et al., RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. ) (ECF No. 33) 14 The parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge McAuliffe December 10, 2020 during which they resolved the claims in this action. Judge McAuliffe agreed 17 || retain jurisdiction over the settlement for 180 days. On December 30, 2020, the parties filed a stipulatic 18 || for voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this actic 19 || has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9 20 || Cir. 1997), and has been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.