T.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CLARENCE LONNELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-DAD-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH SECOND WATCH SGT, et al., AMENDMENT FAILURE TO PROTECT CLAIM AGAINST THE TWO DOE Defendants.

SERGEANTS AND THE DOE

LIEUTENANT AND ON PLAINTIFF’S

EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM FOR

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO HIS

SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS AGAINST

DEFENDANT KQA, DEFENDANT

GONZALEZ, THE TWO DOE

SERGEANTS, THE DOE LIEUTENANT,

AND THE TWO DOE CORRECTIONAL

OFFICERS, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

22 (ECF No. 12)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

Plaintiff, Clarence Lonnell Roberson, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…