Kibler

(PC) Cruz v. Kibler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20211:20-cv-01740California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01740-NONE-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME AND DENYING

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

B. KIBLER, et al., (Docs. 6, 7) Defendants. 35-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff is a state prison proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 17, 2020, the Court issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this action. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff requests a 35-day extension of time to file objections. (Doc. 7.) Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff shall have 35 days from the date of service of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff also requests the appointment of counsel to represent him in this case. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiffs do not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.