Waddle

(PC) Castro v. Waddle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20211:20-cv-01454California1,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL Z. CASTRO, No. 1:20-cv-01454-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND/OR TEMPORARY

C. WADDLE, RESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED Defendant. (ECF No. 11) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Daniel Z. Castro (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order on November 20, 2020. (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff requests an order prohibiting him from being transferred to another facility and to grant him single cell status. (Id. at 4). For the foregoing reasons, the Court recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion. I. LEGAL STANDARDS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF “A federal court may issue an injunction if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.