Murrietta-Golding

Murrietta-Golding v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20211:18-cv-00314California3,380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ISIAH MURRIETTA-GOLDING deceased CASE NO. 1:18-CV-0314 AWI SKO through his successor in interest Christina Lopez, et al.,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

Plaintiffs STAY AND PLAINTFFS’ MOTION FOR

CERTIFICATION OF APPEAL AS

v. FRIVOLOUS

CITY OF FRESNO, CITY OF FRESNO POLICY CHIEF JERRY DYER, FRESNO (Doc. Nos. 86, 87) POLICE SGT. RAY VILLALVAZO, and Does 1-10, 13 Defendants

16 This case arises from a fatal encounter between decedent Isiah Murrietta-Golding 17 (“Murrietta-Golding”) and City of Fresno police officer Ray Villalvazo (“Villalvazo”). Plaintiffs 18 Christina Lopez and Anthony Golding, both individually and purporting to be successors in 19 interest to Murrietta-Golding, bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the First, 20 Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and state law claims for California Civil Code § 52.1 (“Bane 21 Act”), negligence, and assault and battery. On October 15, 2020, the Court denied Villalvazo’s 22 motion for summary judgment, which included a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.