Khoo
(PC) Gray v. Khoo
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20211:20-cv-01047California8,883 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANA GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING CERTAIN
v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
A. KHOO, et al., (ECF No. 24)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
13 Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed December 21, 2020. (ECF No. 24.) I. SCREENING REQUIRMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[]…