Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20211:20-cv-01047California8,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

A. KHOO, et al., (ECF No. 24)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

13 Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed December 21, 2020. (ECF No. 24.) I. SCREENING REQUIRMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.