Gibbs
(PC) Smith v. Gibbs
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00854-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
GIBBS, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Defendants. (ECF No. 24) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I. Background Plaintiff Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Gibbs and Handy1 for the alleged excessive force incident of February 6, 2014. On September 4, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for his excessive force claim against Defendants as required by the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. Fed.…