Purnell

Purnell v. Mora

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20211:19-cv-00210California3,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00210-DAD-BAM Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

14 R.T. MORA, et al., (Doc. No. 10) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action against Fresno County Police Officers R.T. Mora, Hodge, N. Cruz, and B. Phelps (“Defendants”), alleging violations of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 1, 5– 6.) On January 10, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. (Doc. No. 7.) On February 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint states only one cognizable claim and all other claims will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.