Emerson

(PC) Dillingham v. Emerson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20211:18-cv-00507California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY DILLINGHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY MERITS-BASED v. DISCOVERY AND VACATING DEADLINES N.EMERSON, et al., (ECF No. 95) Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 25, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 94.) On November 30, 2020, Defendants filed a request to stay discovery and vacate the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. (ECF No. 95.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition to Defendants’ motion to stay and modify the scheduling order and the time to do so has expired. Local Rule 230(l). The Court is vested with broad discretion to manage discovery. Dichter–Mad Family…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.