Lozano

(PC) Johnson v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20212:19-cv-01128California4,664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. JOHNSON, No. 2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In compliance with this court’s order issued August 28, 2020, plaintiff has submitted a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (See ECF Nos. 10, 15). For the reasons stated below plaintiff will be given the opportunity either to file a final amended complaint or, in the alternative, to proceed on the cognizable claims identified herein. I. PLEADING STANDARD A. Generally Section 1983 “provides a cause of action for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States.” Wilder v. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.