Shearer

(PC) Ruiz v. Shearer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20212:20-cv-02078California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-2078 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. WOODFILL, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel. Plaintiff states that he has difficulty with the English language and has no experience with the law. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.