Santoro

(PC) Brooks v. Santoro

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20211:19-cv-00599California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. BROOKS, 1:19-cv-00599-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

KELLY SANTORO, et al., (ECF No. 11.)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

22 On July 30, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) On October 9, 2020, Plaintiff was granted a forty-five day extension of time to file the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 14.) The forty-five day time period has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint nor requested a further extension of time. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.