Lim

Lim v. Child Protective Services of Tulare County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20211:20-cv-01049California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 CHONG SOOK LIM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01049-NONE-SKO 9 Plaintiff, v. ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

JENNIFER MENNE and MELANIE APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING

HUERTA, SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF

FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN Defendants. / WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 13 (Doc. 9)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Chong Sook Lim is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). The Court has screened Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and finds that it states a cognizable 20 Section 1983 familial association claim against Defendants Jennifer Menne and Melanie Huerta.1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Hardwick v. Cty. of Orange, 844 F.3d 1112, 1116 (9th Cir. 2017); Thornton v. Cty. of Los Angeles, No. CV 16-08482 TJH (AGRx), 2017 WL 11504794, at *2 (C.D. Cal. June 27, 2017); Lahey v. Contra Costa Cty. Dep’t of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.