Lake
(PC) Cagan v. Lake
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXCIME CAGAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01629-AWI-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DISMISSING
v. ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF
S. LAKE, et al., MAY BE GRANTED
Defendants. (ECF No. 7) 16 Plaintiff Maxcime Cagan is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 13, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendation, recommending that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 7.) The findings and recommendation were served on Plaintiff and contained notice…