Lake

(PC) Cagan v. Lake

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20211:19-cv-01629California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXCIME CAGAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01629-AWI-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

S. LAKE, et al., MAY BE GRANTED

Defendants. (ECF No. 7) 16 Plaintiff Maxcime Cagan is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 13, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendation, recommending that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 7.) The findings and recommendation were served on Plaintiff and contained notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.