(PS) Pierson v. Sutter Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III, No. 2:20-cv-00124-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUTTER HEALTH, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Raymond H. Pierson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s July 28, 2020 Order (ECF No. 32), which granted Defendant Sutter Health’s (“Sutter”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14), dismissed Plaintiff’s federal claims without leave to amend, and declined to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s pendent state law claims, thereby dismissing them without prejudice. (ECF No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// 27 The Order also denied as moot Plaintiff’s additional miscellaneous requests (ECF Nos. 21–24), which Plaintiff does not appear to contest here. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action against Sutter and various other physicians…