Doe
Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE individually, and RICHARD No. 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC ROE on behalf of Minor A, Minor B, and Minor C, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, ROXANNE LARA,
DAWN HOROWITZ-PERSON, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff John Doe’s (“Plaintiff”) Request to Seal Documents pursuant to Local Rule 141. (ECF No. 22.) Also before the Court is Defendants Butte County Probation Department and Roxanne Lara’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Request to Seal Documents pursuant to Local Rules 140 and 141. (ECF No. 23.) Both requests pertain to the same document — Defendants’ Response to Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction and Opposition to Pseudonym Motion (ECF No. 19) — and request the Court seal the document. ///
Plaintiff’s request additionally includes a “Request for Sanctions,” which the Court construes as a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110 and will address in a separate order. …