Tankersley

Tankersley v. Arcand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20212:15-cv-01278California6,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:15-cv-01278-TLN-DMC Document 22 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of

DAVID A. DIEPENBROCK (SBN 215679) weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin LAW CORPORATION 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: 916.558.6000 Facsimile: 916.446.1611 Email: ddiepenbrock@weintraub.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL TANKERSLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual, Case No.: 2:15-CV-01278-TLN-DMC Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY

v. DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE AND RETENTION OF

15 WILL ARCAND, in his individual JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE capacity as an employee of State Mining SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; 16 and Geology Board; STEPHEN M. ORDER law corporation

TESTA, in his individual capacity as an 17 employee of State Mining and Geology Board; AND DOES 1 through 10, Courtroom: 2, 15th Floor 18 inclusive, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.