Sinclair

(PS) Spencer v. Sinclair

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20212:20-cv-01266California648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAMUEL R. SPENCER, No. 2:20-cv-01266 TLN AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT F. SINCLAIR, et al., Defendants. 15 This matter is before the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 3, 2020, the undersigned recommended this case be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 27. The recommendation was adopted, over plaintiff’s objections, and this case was closed. ECF Nos. 28, 31, 32. Following entry of judgment, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the judgment, a motion to set aside the judgment, and another motion to amend the judgment. ECF Nos. 35, 36, 37. On November 24, 2020, the undersigned recommended each of these motions be denied. ECF No. 38. On December 7, 2020, plaintiff asked for a 28-day extension of time to object to that recommendation, and the court granted this one-time ex parte request for an extension. ECF Nos. 40, 41. On December 30,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.