Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-01828-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gerald Spence’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 113) granting Defendants G. Kaur and Chambers’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Request for an Extension of Time (ECF No. 112). (ECF No. 118.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s decision to grant Defendants an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 110). (ECF No. 118.) As an initial matter, Plaintiff’s Motion is untimely. A party may object to a non- dispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge within 14 days after service of the order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Here, the Order was issued and…