Doe

Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20212:20-cv-02248California2,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of No. 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC Minor A, Minor B, and Minor C, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT, ROXANNE LARA, and

DAWN HOROWITZ-PERSON,

16 Defendants.

18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John Doe’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms and to Redact or Seal Identifying Documents (“Pseudonym Motion”). (ECF No. 2.) Defendants Butte County Probation Department (“BCPD”), Deputy Probation Officer Roxanne Lara (“Lara”), and Dawn Horowitz-Person (“Horowitz-Person”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have all filed Statements of Non-Opposition to the Motion. (ECF Nos. 20, 25.) Plaintiff filed a Reply. (ECF No. 26.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“PI”), in which Plaintiff seeks an order continuing the Court’s December 9, 2020 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) temporarily enjoining Defendants from revealing Plaintiff’s identity, and permitting ///…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.