22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T430,1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE Case No. 1:19-cv-00800-DAD-EPG COMPANY, et al., 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH v. PREJUDICE 14 DOMETIC CORPORATION, et al., 15 (ECF No. 37) Defendants. 16 17 The Parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 18 37.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 21 22 [T IS SO ORDERED. 23 . P24 . Dated: _ January 7, 2021 [spe Fy 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 2824:T44b,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 | HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE Case No. 1:19-cv-00800-DAD-EPG COMPANY, et al., 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH v. PREJUDICE 14 DOMETIC CORPORATION, et al., 15 (ECF No. 37) Defendants. 16 17 The Parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 18 37.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 21 22 [T IS SO ORDERED. 23 . P24 . Dated: _ January 7, 2021 [spe Fy 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28